|Vol. 3 No. 2 Summer 1997 Braun Consulting News Page 2|
Employment Verification Under Washington Immigration Law
The Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act (IIRIRA) (Public Law 104-208) contains several new provisions that affect employers. Among those changes, Title IV of the law includes a variety of provisions that are listed as follows: INS Investigations: 300 new inspectors will be added to the INS workforce in each of the next three years (900 total).
Opportunity to Correct Good Faith Errors: If an employer makes a good faith attempt to comply with the verification requirements but, in doing so, makes a technical or procedural error, the employer will nevertheless be deemed to have complied with the rules so long as
(1) once notified of the error, the employer corrects it within a specified time period and
(2) the employer is not guilty of engaging in a pattern or practice of violating the verification requirements.
Unfair Immigration-Related Employment Practices
The law addresses two specific practices here:
Fewer Documents to Verify Employment Eligibility
The number and type of documents that
may be used to establish an individual's identity and work eligibility
have been reduced. Some details:
The US. Attorney General is now authorized to prohibit or place conditions on the use of a document for verification purposes if she finds, by regulation, that the document does not reliably establish employment authorization or identity or is being used fraudulently to an unacceptable degree.
Pilot Programs for Employment Eligibility Confirmation
New law provides for three pilot programs. One is based upon an enhanced telephone verification system, one based upon the waiver of certain paperwork requirements if an employee attests to being a US. citizen, and one based upon the use of machine-readable documents. These programs will last four years.
NLRB Protects Union Organizer "Salts" Being Used in Nonunion
Update on Union Organizing Plans
Changes in FLSA?
The House and Senate are considering proposals to amend the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) to allow "comp time" in lieu of overtime pay, flexible schedules, and compressed workweeks.
However, in February, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision that attempts to clarify an important exemption to the overtime rule. In Auer v. Robbins, the Supreme Court examined the "no disciplinary deduction" rule - this rule applies to employees that an employer treats as exempt under the "white-collar" exemption for FLSA's overtime requirements. Unanimously, the Court upheld the federal secretary of labor's interpretation of the rule in two areas: 1) its application to public sector employees and 2) its application to an employer that has a personnel policy that could (but will not necessarily) result in deductions from an exempt employee's pay for disciplinary reasons.
The regulations allow deductions for disciplinary reasons only if the deduction is imposed as a disciplinary measure for violation of a safety rule "of major significance."
Consequences for Employers -
Two rules to remember:
1) unless and until Congress decides otherwise, the "no disciplinary deductions" rule applies equally to both private and public sector employees; and
2) an employees pay is "subject to" deductions if there is either an actual practice of making such deductions or an employment policy that creates a "significant likelihood" of such deductions.
According to the Court, a "significant likelihood" exists only if the policy is clear and particularized - that is, it "effectively communicates" that deductions will be made in specified circumstances. This standard is probably not satisfied if the policy is vague or broadly worded and/or it is nominally applicable to a whole range of personnel, including both salaried and non-salaried employees.
Does this new standard really clarify anything? To be on the safe side, employers should:
review their personnel policies
eliminate any language that could be interpreted to allow disciplinary pay deductions for salaried employees
take steps to ensure that such pay deductions do not actually occur.
From: Washington Employment Law Letter,
For more information about Braun Consulting Group
please leave a message here:
Thank you for your interest in Braun Consulting Group.
1326 5th Ave, Suite 339 / Seattle, WA 98101