Vol. 6
No. 2 Summer 2001 INSIDE OSHA Revises Workplace Injury and Illness Reporting Rule. DOL Narrows Exemption for Labor Relations Consultants. Interim Rules Issued for Bush Executive Orders of Feb. 17th, 2001. FMLA: "Serious Health Condition" Being Redefined. ADA: Medical Examinations / Inquiries Addressed by 3rd Circuit Court. Briefs Violence Updates (Briefs) |
Braun Consulting News See our Archive Pages for Back Issues of Braun Consulting News!
Clinton's Department of Labor cited evidence of a significant increase in
the use of labor relations consultants by employers set on discouraging
union organizing as a reason for narrowing an exemption in the
Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act (LMRDA).
The DOL has revised its interpretation of what is know as the LMRDA's
"advice" exemption, which it claims has effectively shielded consultants
from the law's reporting requirements since 1962. The Labor Department
said the action was necessary to update application of the law's reporting
requirements to third party consultants used by employers.
Under the LMRDA (also known as the Landrum-Griffen Act) which was
established in 1959, employers and labor relations consultants are
required to file reports on any expenditures and any agreements or
arrangements that affect employees' organizing and bargaining rights.
Before the revisions Section 203 (c) created an exemption from the
reporting requirements for "advisory" services. The revised
interpretation significantly narrows the circumstances that can be
considered advice under the statute, and thus have to be reported.
Under the revised interpretation activities that would not have to be
reported include situations where a lawyer or consultant simply reviews
and revises persuasive material prepared by the employer. Conversely,
reporting is required when a lawyer or consultant prepares or provides
persuasive material used by an employer in communicating with employees.
Another reason cited by the DOL for the revision is the consultant's
growing role in labor relations, both in advising on an anti-union
campaign and in producing videos and other communications. The view
until now has been that speeches, scripts, documents or videotapes
fell into the "advice" category since employers could decide to use
them or not. The DOL has said that the advice exemption has become
too broad since an employer "generally has the authority to accept or
reject the work done for him."
Under the new interpretation the duty to report is triggered as long
as persuading workers is the object of the consultant's activity.
The old interpretation provided that most consultant activity -
unless it involved direct contact with workers - fell under the
advice exemption.
While there is no assurances from the Bush Administration, it is possible
this last minute action by the Clinton people may come under scrutiny by
the new Secretary of Labor.
If you have any questions about this new interpretation of LMRDA
contact us at Braun Consulting Group.
3. Interim Rules Issued for Bush Executive Orders of February 17th, 2001.
|