Vol. 6
No. 2 Summer 2001 INSIDE OSHA Revises Workplace Injury and Illness Reporting Rule. DOL Narrows Exemption for Labor Relations Consultants. Interim Rules Issued for Bush Executive Orders of Feb. 17th, 2001. FMLA: "Serious Health Condition" Being Redefined. ADA: Medical Examinations / Inquiries Addressed by 3rd Circuit Court. Briefs Violence Updates (Briefs) |
Braun Consulting News See our Archive Pages for Back Issues of Braun Consulting News!
Two recent federal appellate court rulings (4th and 8th U.S. Circuit
Courts of Appeals) seem to be redefining what is meant by a "serious
health condition" in terms of the Family and Medical Leave Act
(FMLA). Both courts relied heavily on the definition of "serious
health condition" outlined in the law (see App. I), the U.S.
Department of Labor's (DOL) regulations (see App. II) and opinion
letters (see App. IV) to make their rulings. Employers need to understand
these definitions when administering their FMLA program.
Definitions
The Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) (Section 101(11)) defines
"serious health condition" as an illness, injury, impairment, or
physical or mental condition that involves (A) inpatient care in a
hospital, hospice, or residential medical care facility; or (B)
continuing treatment by a health care provider.
The DOL's regulations further provide that "continuing treatment by a
health care provider" must include either (1) a period of incapacity
lasting more than three consecutive calendar days and treatment two or
more times by a health care provider, or (2) treatment by a health care
provider on one occasion resulting in a regimen of continuing treatment
under the provider's supervision (see App. II, 29 C.F.R. §
825.114(a)(2)(i)).
Continuing Treatment
This "continuing treatment" phrase seems to be the area where
questions and disputes arise. Employees and employers differed about
whether there was continuing treatment... and the court rulings seem to be
rather broad in this respect. This leads, in effect, to an interpretation
that lets more conditions in for coverage under the FMLA.
Back on Dec. 12, 1996 the department released an opinion letter
ruling stating that "ordinarily, these health conditions would not
meet the definition in 825.114(a)(2), as they would not be expected
to last for more than three consecutive calendar days and require
continuing treatment by a health care provider as defined in the
regulations. If, however, any of these conditions met the regulatory
criteria for a serious health condition, e.g., an incapacity of more
than three consecutive calendar days that also involves qualifying
treatment, then the absence would be protected by the FMLA" (see App. IV,
FMLA-86).
Recent opinions point back to this ruling.
Both Circuit Courts Are In Agreement
Both the 4th and 8th U.S. Circuit Courts of Appeals have now ruled
that relatively minor illnesses may be considered serious medical
conditions. The 8th Circuit found that an employee with a viral
infection was protected by the FMLA because her condition met the
regulation's definition of "serious health condition."
The 4th Circuit Court held that an episode of the flu constituted an
FMLA-qualifying serious health condition because the worker was
incapacitated for more than three days and saw her doctor three times for
treatment of the illness.
Bottom Line
The trend in Circuit Court Rulings seems to be that relatively minor
ailments may qualify as serious health conditions under the FMLA, if
the "ongoing treatment" clause applies.
Besides the rulings in the 4th & 8th Circuit Courts other recent
opinions from the circuit courts on this topic: Cash v. Smith (Case
No. 242), Caldwell v. Holland of Texas (Case No. 229) and Bailey v.
Amsted Ind. Inc. (Case No. 167).
Employers may feel that Congress did not mean for the FMLA to cover
absences resulting from the flu or similarly minor illnesses.
However, the courts are making rulings that seem to be broadening and
redefining what is considered a "serious health condition"... now including
cases of the flu and viral infection as being covered.
Don't forget to check your State Laws. Several States have overlapping
disability laws where the definition of "disability" is much more
expansive covering sicknesses not covered by the Federal law. Check
carefully before deciding whether to grant FMLA/Disability leave, and
remember that the landscape is shifting.
5. ADA: Medical Examinations / Inquiries Addressed by 3rd Circuit Court.
|